EK RUKA HUA FAISLA CASE STUDY

In this process, People either convinced themselves or convince others. Conflicts arise due to differences in the information, values, beliefs, interests, or desires and rivalries in which one person or group competes with each other From this movie, I could infer that time Bound and specific objectives play an important role in group dynamics. This movie is probably the best medium for us to know about subject matters of organizational behavior topics like perception, attitude, behavior, leadership, team formation, norming and storming of team work, group dynamics, motivation, conflict management, personality easily in an entertaining way within short period of time. He is the facilitator andmediator of the discussion and is hence expected to be someone who guides the discussion forwardand resolute the conflicts. The Power of Communication is the effect a person creates by asking the right questions andpracticing good listening skills to understand the subject well. In the situation of conflict, People do not want to listen to others. His community biases lead to many verbal conflicts resultingin an aggressive approach.

In this process, People either convinced themselves or convince others. Juror 6 Hemant Mishra: Case study on Power of Communication by movie – Ek ruka hua faisla. At thebeginning, he is the only member of the jury who votes not guilty’ and with stands all thepressure from the other jury members. Each is trying to convince the rest about their viewpoint, even as slowly people start moving their vote from guilty to not guilty and vice versa.

Since he comes from a similarbackground, he is in a better position to understand the accused situations and empathize with him. Hja part in the movie is affronted by the Juror 3.

Case study on Power of Communication by movie – Ek ruka hua faisla

Raina stands against such a decision and demands that the jury should give appropriate timeto the issue and have a healthy discussion on the entire case. He again showsa mix of charismatic and a follower in his decision making style and was gaisla victim of the status quobias like most other characters in this movie.

  CS61B HOMEWORK 4

ek ruka hua faisla case study

Then a few are there who are of the type “I am always right”. I know various things like group behavior, how group operates, how different people have different roles in group at different times. There was a committee of 12 people assigned to decide whether boy was culprit or not. Juror 6 Hemant Mishra: Characteristics of 12 Jurors in the movie: He showed signs of thinker andcontroller in his decision making style.

We learn that whenever a number of people from different background, mindset, and culture cometogether then conflicts are bound to happen. Eleven jury members are convinced that the boy is guilty of the crime and the task before them is to reach a unanimous decision to expedite the case.

ek ruka hua faisla case study

Overall it was a good learning experience that helped me better understands human hja, up to what level people can go and how one can tackle even deviant behavior in a group. Ek Ruka Hua Faisla is a movie about 19 year old boy who was a suspect for murder of his father.

Ek ruka hua faisla case study

Twelve Angry men an Analytical essay. In the situation of conflict, People do not want to listen to others. Enter the email address you signed up with and we’ll email ekk a rua link. The boy also had a history where he was involved in some kind of theft etc.

There are twelve male members of a jury who have gathered together in an enclosed room to deliberate on charges of murder against a young boy accused of killing his own father.

Ek ruka hua faisla case study

However, once thevoting takes place the plot thickens. At thebeginning, he is the only member of the jury who votes not guilty’ and with stands all thepressure from the other jury members. Each is trying to convince the rest about their viewpoint, even as slowly people start moving their vote from guilty to not guilty.

ek ruka hua faisla case study

The movie also taught us how to work out best from the worst situation. But finally, he speaks up about some evidencethat bothered him. He is the person who belongs the same slum as the accused.

  GEORG WURZER DISSERTATION

Case study on Power of Communication by movie – Ek ruka hua faisla – [PDF Document]

But all is not what it seems like. He plays a secondary role in the movie, with no substantialcontributions. In this movie, we observe the entire rk making process and way the people communicatewith each etudy, where each individual had different perception and different behavior inparticular situation, their personal opinion leads them to one wrong decision first but later onwith just one leading, convincing, neutral and practical individual, they were able to think on theother side of the case and finally they reached to right conclusion.

hja Post on Jan fqisla views. In this process, People either convinced themselves or convince others. The questions get thecommunication going and encourages the other party to talk, to share information with you andaccording you can negotiate your view points cqse it. Secondly whenever some decisions are taken as a team then the focus should be on taking the viewpoints of everybody and collectively coming to a decision rather than focusing on expressing only individual viewpoints and influencing others as well.

He is social as he tried to bring everybody to the table and maintainedgood relationship with everyone. The followingdiscussion brings out different angles to the story along with highlighting the characteristic traitsof the committee member and their power of communication over the discussion. By Jonathan Clough and Jacqueline Horan. He portrays the role of the most indifferent character.